Primary
neoplasms of the urinary bladder diverticula are rare and present
with special problems in diagnosis and treatment. All bladder diverticulae
are potential sources of hidden neoplasms as they have a late presentation
and often diagnosis is delayed. Hence a thorough evaluation of all
bladder diverticulae to rule out any underlying malignancy is essential.
Introduction
Carcinomas arising within urinary bladder diverticula have a poor
prognosis as compared to neoplasms arising within the bladder lumen
due to early transmural infiltration. Imaging plays an important role
in the diagnosis and the staging of this disease.1 We describe imaging
findings in a 54 year old man who presented with painless haematuria.
Case Report
A 54 year old farmer presented with intermittent painless haematuria
since 15 days. There was no past history of renal calculus or urinary
stone disease. There was no history of addiction. Ultrasonography
(USG) of abdomen and pelvis was performed in the emergency, which
revealed a urinary bladder diverticulum with fine internal echoes
in the bladder. There was left sided moderate hydronephrosis and hydroureter.
Intravenous urogram was performed, which revealed compromised function
of the left kidney with moderate to gross hydronephrosis on the left
side. A urinary bladder diverticulum was confirmed which was arising
from the left posterolateral wall. There was no calculus noted within
the diverticulum or the entire urinary tract. The right kidney and
ureter were unremarkable. Cystoscopy was performed which revealed
a narrow neck diverticulum near the left ureteric orifice with a thickened
abnormal mucosa around the orifice of the diverticulum extending into
the diverticulum. Subsequently a biopsy was done which showed features
suggestive of transitional cell carcinoma. Contrast enhanced CT scan
of the abdomen and pelvis was done to evaluate the extent of the lesion
and perivesical spread. CT scan showed a 2 cm outpouching of the bladder
wall in the left posterolateral region. Left hydroureter was also
noted. The medial wall of the diverticulum was thickened and irregular
with abnormal enhancement, extending into the bladder. There was no
perivesical spread of the tumour. Patient was taken up for surgery
and a diverticulectomy with partial cystectomy was performed.
|
| |
Fig.
1 : Contrast enhanced CT scan of the pelvis at the level
of urinary bladder shows a wide neck diverticulum arising from
the left posterolateral wall. There is diffuse thickening of the
medial wall of the diverticulum extending into the bladder. Note
the dilated left lower ureter. |
Discussion
Urinary bladder diverticula are outpouchings of the urothelium through
defects in the muscular walls, which usually result from lower urinary
tract obstruction. They empty poorly due to lack of muscle fibres
in their walls, stenotic orifice or their large size. This leads to
a variety of complications which include persistent and recurrent
urinary tract infection, ureteral obstruction and the development
of a carcinoma within the diverticulum.2 6% of the bladder diverticula
are known to be malignant.2 Urinary stasis and chronic
inflammation leads to the development of dysplasia, leukoplakia and
squamous metaplasia in approximately 80% of all diverticuli. Urinary
stasis also enhances urothelial susceptibility to urinary chemical
carcinogens.2 Stasis of urine within poorly contractile
urinary bladder diverticulum is the cause of diverticular carcinoma.3
When a bladder tumour and a diverticulum coexist, the tumour is most
often found within the diverticulum.3 Histopathologically,
transitional cell carcinoma is the most common tumour to arise in
a bladder diverticulum. Few cases of an adenocarcinoma,4
sarcoma5 and verrucous carcinoma6 arising in
a bladder diverticulum have been reported.
The thin walls of the diverticulum with relative lack of muscular
elements facilitates early, complete peneteration by neoplasms found
within them. This, together with a delay in diagnosis accounts for
the relatively poor survival with this unusual combination of the
disease. Therefore all bladder diverticuli should be regarded as potential
sources of hidden neoplasm.2
Intravenous urography and cystourethroscopy have been the mainstage
in urologic evaluation of such patients, but CT and USG are increasingly
used and are better modalities in preoperative assessment and diagnosis
of bladder diverticular carcinomas.2 Transabdominal US
has its limitations in evaluating the bladder neck and dome but is
excellent is assessment of diverticuli arising from the posterior
or the lateral walls, which are the most common sites of bladder diverticuli.2
USG can identify the presence, location and extent of the tumour.2
Computed tomography is one of the best modalities for staging of bladder
tumours. Preoperative CT evaluation helps delineate the depth and
the degree of extension of the primary lesion.2 On CT,
urinary bladder diverticular carcinomas appear as a diffuse or focal
thickening of the wall of diverticulum with or without extension into
the perivesical region. The lesions typically show inhomogenous enhancement
following contrast administration. Evaluation of the remaining urinary
tract can also be done in the same sitting.
Cystoscopy is used for confirmation of the disease and as a guide
for tissue sampling. However, frequently cystoscopy may fail to disclose
a tumour in the diverticulum due to a tight orifice or a small lesion
at the base of the diverticulum.2
The interior of all bladder diverticuli should be inspected with a
combination of cystoscopy, panendoscopy and radiography. These studies
coupled with increasing routine use of cytological examination, should
avoid undue delay in the diagnosis of this disease.3
When a tumour is found within a vesical diverticulum, treatment in
most cases consists of a wide excision of the diverticulum together
with a segment of the bladder surrounding the neck of the diverticulum.3
The classic therapy includes a segmental cystectomy with diverticulectomy.
Those with extensive perivesical involvement should receive adjuvant
chemotherapy. The role of preoperative radiotherapy in such patients
is controversial.2
References
1. Dondalski M, White EM, Ghahremani GG, Patel SK. Carcinoma arising
in urinary bladder diverticula: imaging findings in six patients.
AJR 1993; 161 (4) : 817-20.
2. Lowe CF, Goldman SM, Oesterling JE. Computerized tomography in
evaluation of transitional cell carcinoma in bladder diverticula.
Urology 1989; 34 (6) : 390-5.
3. Montague DK, Boltuch RL. Primary neoplasms of the vesical diverticula
: Report of 10 cases. J Urol 1976; 116 : 41-2.
4. Lam KY, Ma L, Nicholls J. Adenocarcinoma arising in the diverticulum
of the urinary bladder. Pathology 1992; 24 (1) : 40-2.
5. Kim MY, Jeon YS, Suh CH, et al. Sarcomatoid carcinoma arising from
the diverticulum of the urinary bladder dome. A difficult diagnosis
with imaging. AJR 1999; 172 (5) : 1454-55.
6. Chiang PH, Chou YH, Chiang CP, et al. Verrucous carcinoma of a
bladder diverticulum. Br J Urol 1991; 68 (3) : 320-1.
+Department of Radiology,
KEM Hospital, Acharya Donde Marg, Parel, Mumbai - 400 012. *Department
of Radiology, Dr. Balabhai Nanavati Hospital, SV Road, Vile Parle
(W), Mumbai 400 056, India.
|