| Home
> Table of Contents
> Case Reports |
| |
| Submental Endotracheal Intubation
: A Rare Technique |
| |
| Chandan Shastri*, Rakesh Kapoor*,
Rutton N Hilloowalla**, BA Tendolkar***, LS Chaudhari+ |
| |
Here is a case of panfacial
fracture, where neither orotracheal nor nasotracheal intubation
could be done, using submental intubation we avoided morbidity
associated with tracheostomy. |
| |
| Introduction |
Panfacial fractures present a unique set
of problems to the anaesthesiologist and the surgeon.
Nasotracheal intubation is contraindicated in such cases
due to associated Lefort I, II or III fractures. Endotracheal
tube can be obstructed by deformed anatomical passages
or can displace bony fragments distally. Oral endotracheal
tube precludes one of the fundamental aspects of surgery,
dental occlusion. Conventional tracheostomy has many inherent
complications. With the knowledge of submental intubation
most of the complications of tracheostomy can be avoided.
|
| |
| Case Report |
A 25 year old man was referred to our institute from
a private hospital. History revealed patient had road
traffic accident two days before referral to the institute.
At the time of mishap he had nasal bleeding followed by
altered consciousness for 2 days. Visible deformity of
facial skeleton included depressed right zygoma. Mouth
opening was more than 4 cms. Malampatti score I dental
malocclusion was evident. Radiological examination showed
fracture zygomatic arch, lateral margin right orbit fracture,
Lefort II and III fracture on right side with comminution
at right frontonasal junction.
The patients airway options were limited. Nasotracheal
intubation was clearly contraindicated because of Lefort
fractures. Oral intubation was precluded because of surgical
prerequisite of checking dental occlusion. Submental intubation
was opted against tracheostomy.
 |
 |
Fig. 1 : Orotracheal intubation |
Fig. 2 : Orotracheal intubation, converted into submental endotracheal intubation |
Patient was kept fasting for 10 hours preoperatively.
Inj. Atropine 0.6 mg IM given before surgery. Preoxygenation
with 100% O2 given for 5 minutes. Induction of anaesthesia
done with injection Thiopentone 5 mg/kg intravenously.
Ability to mask ventilate was confirmed. Injection Scoline
2 mg/kg given intravenously. After direct laryngoscopy,
oral endotracheal intubation done with 38G flexometallic
tube. Throat packing done. Anaesthesia was maintained
with O2:N2O = 40:60 and infusion of Propofol 500 mg and
vecuronium 6 mg mixed together, at the rate of 30 ml/hr.
Now 3 cm incision was made in the right submental region
by the plastic surgeon. It was extended intraorally. Endotracheal
tube was disconnected from the non-rebreathing valve of
breathing circuit. Connector was removed from the tube.
The pilot balloon was grasped by the artery forceps and
was pulled out gently, taking care not to damage it. Now
by the pulling the pilot tube, while stabilizing the tracheal
end of tube by Magill’s forceps, proximal end of
tube was removed out. Connector and breathing system were
attached again. Pulse oximeter and cardioscope showed
no changes throughout the procedure. After reattachment,
normal capnography waveform confirmed that tube manipulation
did not result in change in tube position. Tube was wrapped
with gauze, fixed with sutures taking care not to damage
the tube. Now the surgeon could easily access both nasal
and oral fields.
Throat packing gave extra margin of safety against aspiration
of blood. Surgery went uneventfully for a duration of
10 hours. After the end of surgery, submental intubation
was converted to oral intubation by pulling pilot tube
into oral cavity, submental wound was closed.
Reversal of neuromuscular blockade was done uneventfully
by injection Glycopyrolate 8 mg/kg and injection Neostigmine
0.05 mg/kg intravenously. After checking adequate recovery
from neuromuscular blockade, patient was extubated.
|
| |
| Discussion |
Description of submental intubation dates back to 1986
by Altemir, a maxillofacial surgeon.1 This technique offers
a secure airway to the anaesthesiologist, optimal operating
field and opportunity to check dental occlusion to the
surgeon and less morbidity to the patient. So this technique
was appreciated, well deservedly, by all the members of
the team.
Nasotracheal intubation is contraindicated usually in
maxillofacial fractures since the complications are inadvertent
introduction of tube into cranium, haemorrhage, obstraction
to tube by distorted airway architecture, distal dislodgement
of bony fragments by tube, meningitis, etc.2-4
Tracheostomy, an alternative plan, has built in complications
like severe haemorrhage, damage to neuromuscular structures,
pneumothorax, subcutaneous emphysema, tracheal stenosis,
tracheomalacia, cosmetic disfigurement, etc.5
Submental intubation though has few complications like
infection, orocutaneous fistula, can be at times challenging
if attention is not paid to proper selection of tube.6
Connector should be loose enough to facilitate easy disconnection,
yet tight enough not to allow accidental disconnection
of continued leak. We have surpassed this problem by having
separate tubes, with written labels, which are checked
routinely prior to intubation.
Amin et al describes the use of capnagraphy during the
process of converting orotracheal to submental and also
throughout the surgery, to confirm the position of tube
and to serve as warning tool against accidental extubation.
Our experience also matches the authors' opinion.7
Drolet et al described the use of tracheal tube exchanger
in case of limited mouth opening. But associated complications
were thought to be too high and is not used in our institute.8
MacInnis et al described the use of midline incision
to avoid excess bleeding, but since our previous experience
with paramedian approach was uneventful, we went ahead
with paramedian approach.10
Contraindications to submental orotracheal intubation
are infection at the site of incision, mandibular symphysis
fracture, inability to open mouth, etc.
The list of procedures, where submental intubation can
be used safely wherever orotracheal or nasotracheal tube
hinders surgical access are innumerable, like oral surgeries
in patients with nasal obstruction, plastic surgery for
cleft lip correction, rhinoplasty, etc.9
Altemir et al described the use of laryngeal mask airway
via submental approach, in conditions where endotracheal
tube has to be avoided, or simply is not desired.11
We conclude that knowledge of submental intubation enables
anaesthesiologist and the surgeon to deliver better quality
of patient care if used in appropriate cases.
|
| |
| References |
| 1. |
Altemir FH. The submental
route for endotracheal intubation new technique. J
Maxillofac Surg 1986; 14 : 64-5. |
| 2. |
Davis C. Submental intubation in complex
craniomaxillofacial trauma. ANZ J Surg 2004; 74 (5)
: 379-81. |
| 3. |
Koudstall MJ, vander Wall KG, Mallior
C, Rupreht J. Submental intubation: surgical and anaesthesiological
aspects. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2003; 147 (19) : 945. |
| 4. |
Johnson TR. Submental versus tracheostomy.
Br J Anaesth 2002; 89 (2) : 344-5. |
| 5. |
Callahan V, O Connor AFF. Adult and
paediatric tracheostomy - technique, complications
and alternatives. Curr Pract Surg 1994; 6 : 219-22. |
| 6. |
Ahmed FB, Mitchel V. Hazards of submental
tracheal intubation. Anaesthesia 2004; 59 (4) : 410-1. |
| 7. |
min M, Dill-Russel P, Manisali M, Lee
R, Sinton I. Facial fractures and submental intubation.
Anaesthesia 2002; 57 : 1195. |
| 8. |
Drolet P, Girard M, Poirier J, Grenier
Y. Facilitating submental tracheal intubation with
an endotracheal tube exchanger. Analg 2000; 90 (1)
: 222-3. |
| 9. |
Nwoku AL, Al Balawi HA, Al-Zahrani
SA. A modified method of submental tracheal intubation.
Saudi Med J 2002; 23 (1) : 73-6. |
| 10. |
MacInnis E, Baig M. A modified submental
approach for oral endotracheal intubation. Int J Oral
Maxillofacsurg 1999; 28 (5) : 344-6. |
| 11. |
Altemir FH, Montero SA. Submental
route revisited using the laryngeal mask airway, a
technical note. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2000; 28 (6)
: 343-4. |
| |
|
RENOPROTECTIVE THERAPY : IS IT BLOOD PRESSURE OR ALBUMINURIA THAT MATTERS?
The REIN-2 Study Group, address whether reduction of blood pressure below 140/90 mm Hg offers additional renoprotection. They added the dihydropyridine calcium-channel-blocker felodipine to ramipril, an inhibitor of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) in 335 patients.
Felodipine was not renoprotective. This finding is remarkable given that felodipine lowered systolic and diastolic blood pressures by 4 and 3 mmHg, respectively. On the basis of their findings the authors inadvertently challenge the widely accepted view of nephrologists that further reduction of blood pressure should be aimed at to achieve optimum renoprotection.
The finding that blood pressure lowering did not offer further renal protection brings a dilemma, because dose adjustments, and adding other drugs to better protect the kidneys, is still titrated on blood pressure the more blood pressure is lowered, the more protection should be offered. This concept is challenged by REIN-2. Albuminuria is a risk marker of progressive renal and cardiovascular disease. Antihypertensive treatment that lowers not only blood pressure but in parallel also lowers urinary albumin loss will offer more renoprotection than a regimen that does not lower urinary albumin excretion.
For optimum renoprotection, titration on urinary albumin excretion is preferable to titration on blood pressure.
As such, albuminuria might be considered an early manifestation of generalised endothelial dysfunction, atherosclerotic damage, or both. Screening for albuminuria might therefore detect patients at risk of progressive atherosclerosis, ultimately resulting in renal and cardiac failure, and therapeutic interventions with an ACE inhibitor may help to prevent not only renal but also cardiac failue. The renoprotective effect of a drug should not only be tested by its ability to lower blood pressure but also by its effect on decreasing urinary albumin excretion.
Paul E De Jong, Dick de Zeeuw, The Lancet, 2005; 365 :913-14. |
|
|
|
*Junior Resident; **Lecturer; ***Associate Professor; +Professor and HOD;
Department of Anaesthesiology, KEM Hospital, Seth GS Medical College, Mumbai 400 012
|
| |
|